Candidate's Name :  Ken V. Krawchuk
Political Party: Libertarian

Office you are running for: Governor

State: Pennsylvania
County: Montgomery (home county)
District: Statewide


1) Do you believe that the Second Amendment confirms the individual right of every American citizen to possess and use (update of keep and bear) militia/military weapons for individual self-defense, as well as for the defense of the State / National defense?

      Yes, and the U.S. Supreme Court also backs that position.  Further, Article 1, Section 21 of the Pennsylvania Constitution says that "The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the state shall not be questioned."  I have no question what that means.

10 Points


2) If elected would you support legislation for the removal of firearm laws and regulations? If your answer is yes, and if you are elected, what specific legislation would you propose/support to ensure that this individual right is protected?  Which current laws which infringe upon this individual right would you seek to repeal?

      Yes, I would support the repeal of most every firearms regulation, starting with Mr. Fisher's betrayal of gun owners with his Act 17 that creates an unconstitutional registry of guns.  I'd also work to institute Vermont-style carry laws here, and repeal any law that's in conflict with that concept.
     

10 Points


3) What do you consider are "legitimate" reasons to own a firearm?
Check as many as apply:
    [X] Personal Defense
    [X] Home Defense
    [X] Defense of your country (Unorganized Militia)
    [X] Hunting
    [X] Farm Use
    [X] Competitive Shooting
    [X] Informal Sport Shooting
    [X] Informal Target Practice and/or Plinking
    [X] Collecting
    [X] Constitutional Rights
    [X] Other (See Article 1, Section 21 of the Pennsylvania Constitution)
    [X] All of the above
    [ ] None of the above

10 Points


4) Would you support the banning of some firearms or ammunition? (IE: Saturday night specials, "assault weapons", Hollow points, and "Safety Slugs") Why and to what extent?

      No.  Not only would I be in violation of my oath of office if I did, statistics unequivocally show that gun control kills.

10 Points


5) Do you believe that firearms and/or firearm owners should be registered? Which ones and why?

      No.  Not meaning to repeat myself, but I would be in violation of my oath of office if I did call for such registration (as Mr. Fisher's Act 17 did).

10 Points


6) Do you support equal rights for all citizens of the United States regardless of the person's sexuality / orientation and / or gender identity/_expression?

      Yes.  The law should grant no group any special protection or special handicap for any reason, whether for sexual orientation, race, religion, legal status (such as with corporations), geographic location (such as with emissions inspection), racial or other profiling, national origin, etc.

      I also support gay marriage, and would work to extend all the rights that opposite sex unions have to same sex unions as well.  That includes inheritance, joint tenant ownership, power of attorney regarding medical issues, adoption, custody of children, visitation rights, etc.  It does not matter what sex the partners may be; if it's a similarly-permanent relationship, then the privileges must be equal.  What's good for the goose-and-gander is just as good for the goose-and-goose, or gander-and-gander.

10 Points


7) Which of the following would you be willing to support in regards to same-gender and/or polyamorous marriages and/or civil unions?
  Check as many as apply:
    [X] Domestic partnerships for same-sex couples
    [X] Domestic partnerships for opposite-sex couples
    [X] Domestic partnerships for polyamorous (more than two consenting adults)
    [X] Same-sex marriages
    [X] Opposite sex marriages (What we have now)
    [X] Polyamarous marriages (between more than two consenting adults)
    [X] All of the above. Everyone should have equal rights under the law.
    [ ] None of the above. Government has no role in defining a marriage. Leave it to the church.
    [ ] Other__________________________________________

      Let me add that I almost checked your "none of the above" box, because I also believe that government should have no role in defining a marriage, but it's not just up to the church.  I'd say it's up to the individuals involved to determine their relationship, not the government or the church.

10 Points


8) Do you support the right for people to act as they wish in a private setting, with other consenting adults?

      Yes.  What more is there to say on the question?

10 Points


9) In July 2000 the Police Dept. of Attleboro Massachusetts entered a private party without a search warrant. The party was not open to the public or in the business to make a profit. Any donations given were used to pay rent. When the police entered, they arrested two people.  The first person who was arrested organized the event. The second person arrested was arrested because she spanked her consenting adult partner with a wooden spoon. Do you support the actions of  the Attleboro police as given in this example? Why?

      No.  I support property rights and the right for you to live your life your way.  Were it under my jurisdiction, I would take action against the police officers.

10 Points


10) Do you support equal immigration rights for partners of US residents, regardless of their sexuality / orientation and / or gender identity/_expression?

      Yes.  All should be equal under the law regardless of sexual orientation, race, religion, legal status, geographic location, national origin, etc.

10 Points


Do you have an additional statement to make that is not covered by this questionnaire?  Use as much space as you
wish.

      I am not alone in my beliefs that all people are created equal and deserve equal treatment under the law.  All Libertarians believe this, that you have the inalienable right to live your life your way without government interference, provided you respect the rights and property of your neighbor.  Every law we Libertarians support or oppose can be traced back to this one principle, and our message of tolerance and diversity has resonated with the voting public.  Today the Libertarian Party is the third largest political party hands down, outnumbering all the fourth parties rolled up in a single ball.  We have 71 Libertarians serving in elected or appointed public office here in Pennsylvania, with over 500 nationally, more than all the other fourth parties combined.  And our numbers continue to grow year after year.

      Even so, a lot of people tell me, "Ken, I like your ideas, but be real.  You'll never get elected".  But when you crunch the numbers, it turns out that in a competitive, 3-way race, a Libertarian can be elected Governor THIS YEAR by attracting the vote of only 1 in 8 voting-age Pennsylvanians.

      How so?  According to the FEC, there are about 9 million voting-age Pennsylvanians, but less than 7 million registered. A 32.4% turnout in the last gubernatorial race meant less than 3 million votes were cast. Assuming the same turnout again, split that total vote 3 ways, and victory requires less than a million votes -- call it one out of eight to be certain -- or even fewer than that, if the turnout is low. Only 10% to 12% of voting-age Pennsylvanians will elect the next governor; just one in eight.

      If the gay community alone voted to elect a Krawchuk Administration, it would be a landslide.  It would be the same sort of landslide if the gun owners alone voted Libertarian.  Ditto for other groups who have only the Libertarians to champion their cause.  All it takes is one in eight voting age Pennsylvanians.  It takes people like you, someone who is still intrigued enough to be reading this survey, to make that victory come to pass.  Tell your like-minded friends that they have a real choice this year. Tell them how all it takes is one in eight.  Tell them to tell their friends to register to vote before October 7th, and to vote for Ken Krawchuk for Governor on November 5th.

      Because if people keep on voting the way they've been voting, they'll keep on getting just what they've been getting.  And I don't know about you, but I have had enough.

      Thanks for soliciting my thoughts.

      - Ken