Breaking Barriers and Building Bridges
a guide to working in both the pink and shooting
communities
Socially, the pink and shooting communities are both quite similar. Both
are often insular and can be closeted, and both have a stereotypical
preconceptions about what the other is like. Members of either group can
feel threatened by a representative of the other group. Because you belong
to two groups which are supposed to oppose each other, people are forced to
question their preconceptions about whether shooters and pink people should
be adversarial and why. Their confusion creates curiousity and gives you
a chance to step in and explain your views, potentially building
relationships.
When you appear in one community as a representative of both, you want to
use your membership credentials in one group as credibility to break down
the preconceptions they have about the other group. You enjoy a priviledged
position as an ambassador from the "enemy" group who also has citizenship in
this one. Make the best use of this position when negotiating with contacts
from a pink or shooting organization:
- Be a good citizen. Build good karma in the community you are negotiating
with. Volunteer your group's personnel to help with events. Help
fund-raise or repair grounds or teach classes. Show your face around the
community and be a good neighbor.
- Act like a professional, and present your requests to the Board of
Directors, or other appropriate representative, as if they are
straightforward and reasonable. The more businesslike you act, the more
businesslike they are likely to act in return.
- Your contacts may act cold or hostile because they feel threatened. When
you detect hostility, do your best to put them at ease and make them
comfortable.
- When negotiating with a contact who is ostensibly hostile to your cause,
do your best to put yourself mentally in the other person's position.
Start by assuming the other party is a reasonable person and has a
motivation which you may not agree with, but is consistent. Try to
understand the thought process behind their positions, and if you cannot
find it, ask them to explain it, with genuine curiousity.
- Remember that a contact does not need to agree with you to respect you,
and vice versa. If you cannot get agreement, at least strive for mutual
respect.
- Limit the issues on the discussion table. More than likely, you will never
get full agreement on the entire range of social issues between any
significantly large group of people, even within a pink or shooting group.
On any controversial social issue, such as abortion or the death penalty,
there will usually be a range of opinion in even the most liberal or
conservative groups. Acknowledge this and point it out when necessary.
Shooting groups should focus on shooting rights. Pink groups should focus
on alternative sexuality. When a group starts to stray from its mission
and pull in a broader social agenda, challenge them to stick to their core
purpose. For example, don't argue whether homosexuality is right or wrong
with the gun club - a large enough group of people will have diverse moral
views on that - discuss whether this specific set of shooters, who happen
to be gay, will be allowed to use the same facility with the same rights
as the other shooters.
- Find common ground. When facing a potentially adversarial contact,
do your homework and identify at least one area where you agree - there
must be one. For example, most liberals support strong environmental
protection - and so do must shooters. Start the discussion by referencing
common ground, to defuse an adversarial stance.
- Think your positions through and be willing to examine them from other
points of view. Practice arguing your position from different political
points of view. Think, why would a liberal support firearms rights of pink
rights? Why would a conservative, or a socialist? Do not attempt to argue
your position using a political philosophy that your opponent disagrees
with. Argue it using *their* system of philosophy, and you may make an
impression. If you do not understand their political system, take the time
to learn it before you have the discussion.
- Appear thoughtful, reasonable, and moderate. People from both sides
may try to provoke you to confrontation. If you have thought your answers
through and remain reasonable without losing your cool, you gain
credibility.
- When you are asking for a concession from a contact, do not go empty
handed. Appeal to the contact's self-interest by having something to offer
them. For example, when asking the gun club to let you bring your pink
group their regularly, offer to have at least 60% of the group members
be club members, and actively promote club membership to the group. Or
offer to run special events that are open to the public, such as "learn to
shoot" days to get more members into the club.
- If your request is denied, fall back, but stay in the community, keep
building karma, and look for a later opportunity to address the issue
again. Have your group ready to step in heroically, but as your group and
not as individual members, when volunteers are sorely needed for
something. Remember that every year brings new board elections, and
eventually you stop being "those queers" or "those gun nuts" and start
being "our queers" and "our gun nuts".
Being a member of a pink shooting community provides a unique opportunity to
educate people on both sides, where the education is most needed. By working
in both communities, you expose people who have fearful preconceptions to a
less threatening reality, changing people's perceptions. Your very existence
is a type of activism, and can have great effect by helping to shatter some
of the mental dichotomies people use to pidgeonhole each other, expose
common bonds that are swept under the rug, and create real dialogue that our
political climate discourages. It can also lead to your making friends in
unlikely places. Stay cool, have fun, and treat people fairly, and even when
you lose, you will win people's respect. In the long run, you can change
people's minds about guns and alternative sexuality, one mind at a time.